
Kid Rock
Devil Without A Cause

Limp Bizkit
Significant Other

Nine Inch Nails
The Fragile

Red Hot Chili Peppers
Californication

Beastie Boys
Liscensed to Ill
Hole
Celebrity Skin
Marilyn Manson
Mechanical Animals
|
Where
Have All the Rock Stars Gone?
By
Brendan Clarke
----------
January
4, 2000
| Page 1,
2, 3
If the latest MTV Video Music Awards are any indication, the rebellious
spirit of rock and roll is receding faster than David Lee Roth's
hairline. Much to the squealing delight of teenage girls, their
over-concerned mothers, and disturbed middle-aged loners, prize
after prize were awarded to gracious, impeccably-groomed pop stars
with perfect smiles and million-dollar manners. Ricky Martin, N
Sync, Brittney Spears, Backstreet Boys, Christina Aguilera, 98 Degrees--our
charts are topped by nauseatingly innocuous Stepford husbands and
wives, causing one to wonder who the hell is buying this crap. In
the prophetic words of the late brilliant comic Bill Hicks, "Is
there that much babysitting money being passed around?"
Granted, this white-washed phenomenon is nothing new. Pop music
has always been populated by media-friendly teeny boppers, the Nelson,
Osmond, and Partridge Families providing as much musical invention
and attitude as a box of Pull 'Em Up Huggies. But usually, most
pop stars had at least a modicum of sexuality inherent in their
images. Elvis, the ultimate pop star, had his entire lower body
censored on the Ed Sullivan Show just in case his hip swivels
reminded a nation of frustrated suburban house fraus that they were
still functioning below the belt. Hell, even Madonna, the '80's
queen of vacuous pop, blatantly advertises that she loves to fuck,
early and often, men, women, sheep, fresh fruit, and miscellaneous
(a la Dennis Rodman). Simple, heart-warming ideas such as irresponsible
sex, recklessness, and self-destruction are sadly missing in action
from today's pop scene.
In the not-too-distant past, this roll-over user-friendliness was
a non-issue, because the "Top 40" world was gloriously offset by
the existence of true rock and rollers who garnished a devilish
glee from spitting in the face of middle America's puritan sensibilities.
While acne-clad minors swooned to Davey Jones crooning "Daydream
Believer," Jimi Hendrix busted fuddy-duddy eardrums with his flaming-guitar
and acid-dropping psychedelia. While tight-pantsed Leif Garrett
swayed his little booty for the feather-haired roller disco queens,
Jimmy Page ate tuna fish out of underage girls' honeypots. More
recently, as Debbie Gibson and Tiffany battled it out for mall rat
supremacy, Axl Rose and Slash spewed forth their racist, heterosexist,
misogynist (and just about any other "ist" you can come up with)
drunken ramblings, much to the chagrin of every church group in
America. Not that careless ignorance is right, but it's certainly
a refreshing change from an all-too-serious world.
Where has that self-destructive soul gone in the oversensitive
nineties? As the MTV awards rolled on, the cavalcade of perfectly
constructed cheekbones and grateful accolades ceased for a moment
for the "Best Rock Video" presentation, which was won by head-banging
hard rockers Korn. Finally, here are some serious rock stars who
are sure to swear, urinate, or otherwise expose this "awards show"
for the inane sham that it really is.
"We're so grateful for this award. We've worked so long and hard
to get it..."
Sadly, no punchline was forthcoming. Korn was genuinely grateful
for winning a fucking MTV award. But wait a minute... aren't these
guys shit-kicking, no-compromise rockers? Shouldn't they loathe
MTV and the empty artlessness it propogates? Or aren't they in the
least bit tempted to shock the mindless lemmings tuned in by mocking
the faux-importance of this non-event? Come on-even softy Fiona
Apple said "bullshit" in her acceptance speech. Is one middle finger
too much to ask?
Rock stars aren't supposed to be nice, well behaved, or
eternally grateful for meaningless corporate awards. They're supposed
to be representatives of disillusioned youth, frightening parents
and embodying a true freedom about which most of us only dream.
They're supposed to be crude, soulful anti-heroes. Does this
ethos exist anymore, or has Viacom purchased the rights to the rock
and roll spirit? We must examine today's "rockers" for even a glimmer
of hope for the future:
Page
1, 2, 3
|